Thursday, December 5, 2019

Good Corporate Governance System Free-Samples Myassignmenthelp

Question: Indicate three Positive or Negative Signals from the Companys good and Bad Corporate Governance observed in the Companys annual report. Answer: Introduction IAG (Insurance Australia Group) is seemed to be committed to attaining the highest level of the corporate governance for the purpose of ensuring the stability for the future sustainability of the organization and also the creation of the long-term values for the shareholders are depicted. For the purpose of achieving the long-term aspects, the IAG is aspired by showing its spirit to be closer to all the interactions made with the customers, clients, partners and the shareholders in an active way (Haney, Mazzola and Schroeder, 2005). For the enhancement of the influence, the focus is being made by the company for showing the creation of the appropriate regulatory environment that will enhance the growth of the study and also the stability, and the sustainability is being determined by showing the appropriate structure of the work. The construction process is being determined by showing the appropriate structure of the corporate governance and also the enhancement of the work can be sh own by depicting the proper construction of the work (IAG, 2016). Therefore the sound regulatory regimes are created for assisting the stability, and the sustainability in the environment of the company is being shown. The active participation is being included in the form of showing the communication of the systems and the democratic movement is being focused by showing the enhancement of the work. No direct donations are provided to the political parties by the company and also are depicted to be involved in the democratic processes. The identification of the three positive signals that are depicted to be good corporate governance system as applied by the company IAG (Insurance Australia Group) are as follows:- The commitment made by the IAG (Insurance Australia Group) towards the remuneration framework is being illustrated to be attracting, retaining and motivating the high-quality consecutive that enables the company in achieving the superior and the sustainable performance. Therefore the growth of the company can be depicted to be creating a positive impact on the stakeholders are provided by showing the form of the returns on the longer period (Kim, Nofsinger and Mohr, 2010). The remuneration structure created by showing the appropriate structure of the work is showing the division of the framework which is needed to be developed in the form of the three common forms which are the fixed remunerations, short term remunerations, and the long term remunerations. The decision made on the part of the measurement during the difficult conditions are showing the appropriate environment for the development of the children, and also the construction of the business can be made by showing the appropriate framework of the work. The deficit level is being measured by showing the appropriate rewarding structure that enabled the organization to have an appropriate benefit by considering the Corporation Acts (Krivogorsky, 2012). The positive reward can also depict in the form of both the strategic and the financial goals which are easily achieved by showing the measurement of the goals. It also enables the company to establish an appropriate enhancement of the business. The integration of the strategic goals enables the company to construct an appropriate progress of the work which can be easily constructed by showing the enhancement of the long-term incentive plan. The construction of the goal is being made showing the returns made on the part of the shareholder's return and also the cash on return on equity is being made. This ensures the future security by using these plans for the betterment of the future and also the measurements can be easily achieved by showing the enhancement in the measurements undertaken by the company (Mallin, 2016). The identification of the three positive signals that are depicted to be good corporate governance system as applied by the company IAG (Insurance Australia Group) are as follows:- The repetition of the process included in this case enables the appropriate establishment of the work which is being used for showing the enhancement in work and also t shows the degradation of the growth while keeping mind about the appropriate opportunities that are established by the company. The inappropriate securities will enable in showing the appropriate formation of the work which will help in showing the enhancement of the process and also the establishment of the work can be made by showing the ultimate end of the goals (Martin, 2006). The negative impact can also be created by disobeying the policies which are essential for the establishment of the work for the purpose of showing the enhancement in the study. It also enables the establishment of the work which will show the deformation of the structure as achieved by the company for securing the future perspectives (Mitchell, 2009). The sudden choice for closing down the market will show the inappropriate process that is used for showing the impact on the company. Therefore the following of the disciplines are a part necessary for the establishment of the commercial insurance business and also it shows the appropriate exhibition of the processes that are essential for the development of the organization. The establishment of the negative factors will also show the path for the improvement of the business and also can be able to exhibit the necessary information for the purpose of structuring the business. Therefore the successful commercial insurance plan must be created that will attract the clients and the customers for running the business on the right track (Monks and Minow, 2010). Therefore the negative and the positive signals are depicted to be good corporate governance system as applied by the company IAG (Insurance Australia Group) which shows the appropriate explanation of the research. References Haney, V., Mazzola, L. and Schroeder, B. (2005).Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall. IAG (2016).CORPORATE GOVERNANCE. [online] www.iag.com.au. Available at: https://www.iag.com.au/sites/default/files/Documents/Results%20%26%20reports/IAG_2016_Corporate-Governance-statement.pdf [Accessed 6 May 2017]. Kim, K., Nofsinger, J. and Mohr, D. (2010).Corporate governance. Boston [Mass.]: Pearson. Krivogorsky, V. (n.d.).Law, corporate governance, and accounting. Mallin, C. (2016).Corporate governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Martin, D. (2006).Corporate governance. London: Thorogood. Mitchell, L. (2009).Corporate governance. Farnham: Ashgate. Monks, R. and Minow, N. (2010).Corporate governance. Chichester: Wiley.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.